Tag Archives: nicky gumbel

Alpha Experience

by “Recovering Agnostic”
April 5, 2013

My Alpha experience – why I consider the course to be cynical and dishonest

The Independent recently ran an article gushing with praise for the Alpha Course, calling it “British Christianity’s biggest success story“. I can understand that in a world where results are what gets you noticed, but having attended an Alpha Course once upon a time, I still find it both appalling and wryly amusing that the church is putting so much weight on a course that’s so fundamentally dishonest.

I went on the course at a time when I was feeling uncertain of my faith, the best part of ten years ago. I thought a return to the basics might be just what I needed, so I booked myself in and prepared to ask my questions.

Before I go any further, and to forestall common defences of Alpha, I want to emphasise that I was under no illusions about the theology of the course, but that was what I wanted at the time, and I desperately wanted to believe. I also know that courses vary massively in tone and content, even though this is against the wishes of Nicky Gumbel and Holy Trinity Brompton, but the course I attended worked through the standard videos and books. What I experienced was the very core of Alpha.

The first couple of weeks were pleasant and inoffensive. Gumbel’s video talks were relatively vague and platitudinous, but our group had some interesting discussions. Some knew nothing about Christianity, some knew quite a lot, and one guy was always asking about Islam, which was a bit odd, and suggested he was probably attending the wrong course. The one thing that puzzled me was that no one was prepared to correct obvious errors and misunderstandings.

That all started to change soon enough. When Gumbel introduced the Bible, suddenly all the fluff was moved to one side. A couple of weak, hackneyed arguments about the provenance of the Bible were rushed through as if they had a train to catch, and from that point on, it was expected that any question could be resolved by appealing to the Bible as an infallible book of rules.

It was also about this time that the course organisers started to get far more involved. From not correcting misunderstandings, suddenly they were pretty obviously starting to tell everyone what to think. I’ve since read Gumbel’s book on running an Alpha Course, and this is what they’re told to do – avoid correction or criticism for the first few weeks, then start hitting them hard with the party line. It’s a deliberate strategy.

When I’m asked to describe Alpha, the phrase I use most often is bait-and-switch. The whole thing is based on the idea of friendly discussion, but quickly becomes an RE lesson. We have some old fragments of parchment containing copies of Biblical texts, therefore we can assume that it’s all 100% true. We’re just going to talk about some issues, except for when we go off on the Holy Spirit Weekend!

The what? Yes, you read correctly – the Holy Spirit Weekend.

I could say a lot of things about the Holy Spirit Weekend. It’s undoubtedly clever, but I think it’s also deeply cynical and manipulative. Everyone goes away somewhere to learn about the Holy Spirit. Why do you need to go away for a weekend? Because the unspoken intention is that the new hothouse environment will facilitate a spiritual experience that will get you hooked. One session is even called “How can I be filled with the Holy Spirit?”

Clever churches get some church members to come along as well, ostensibly to help out on a more intensive weekend, but it also has the handy advantage of helping to create the right atmosphere. A bunch of confused Brits aren’t an ideal group if you want to encourage ecstatic spiritual experiences, but throw in a few people who know the drill (trust me, there is one) and it tips the balance considerably.

The weekend is at the heart of the entire course. The first few weeks deal with some basic housekeeping and weed out timewasters, and then they want you to be hooked as soon as possible. So they take you off somewhere strange, fill the place with music and people speaking strange languages, and wait for the payoff.

After that, the rest of the course seems slightly dull, stacking additional layers on top of what’s previously been discussed. If you’re in by this point, you’ll lap it up. If not, it’s just more data on what Christians believe, which will probably leave you cold, but might possibly be enough to convince you to “graduate” to church at the end of the course.

You might have gathered that I’m not a fan. I think the course is dishonest in its advertising and its arguments, sometimes manipulative, and always cynical. Finding out quickly moves into being taught, and then into emotional exploitation in unfamiliar group settings, all step by step, like a frog being boiled alive.

If a recognised cult was behaving like this, you wouldn’t be surprised.

About Recovering Agnostic
I’m Christian by upbringing, agnostic by belief, cynical by temperament, broadly scientific in approach, and looking for answers. My main interest at the moment is in turning my current disengaged shrug into at least a working hypothesis

Leave a comment

Filed under The Ramblings of a Reformed Ecclesiastic



by Tricia Tillin

The following article appeared in The Times, 11 May 1996,


A WOMAN has walked out of her church and is holding services in her living
room, because she says she cannot bring herself to “snort like a pig and bark
like a dog” on a Church of England course. Angie Golding, 50, claims she
was denied confirmation unless she signed up for the Alpha course, which she
says is a “brainwashing” exercise where participants speak in tongues, make
animal noises and then fall over.

She has left the evangelical St Marks in Broadwater   Down, Kent, with 14
members of the congregation and founded a church at home in Tunbridge
Wells. She said: “I’ll be a fool for the Lord any day, but I won’t be a fool for

However, the church last night denied that she had been refused
confirmation, and course organisers said she had misunderstood the nature of
the event… “St Mark’s is running an Alpha course at the moment which a
number of people are attending. Those being confirmed this summer are
attending the course as well.”

Mark Elsdon-Drew, of Holy Trinity Brompton, said the Alpha course included
lectures on the Holy Spirit. “It affects different people in different ways.” He
said the course had the “overwhelming support” of Church leaders and
theologians: “The suggestion of animal noises in connection with the course
is unwarranted and could not have been made by anyone who is familiar with
the material.”

Everyone is asking “What about Alpha?” What is it, and what are we to believe
about it?

The Alpha course is an evangelistic initiative begun by Holy Trinity Brompton –
perhaps better known now for its promotion of the Toronto Blessing.

The official history of the Alpha Course begins 16 years ago when a member of
HTB, Charles Marnham, set up an informal home group to present answers to
basic gospel questions. However, HTB curate, Nicky Gumbel, transformed the
course into what we see today. [see endnote] It is designed to appeal to non-believers, with every detail – the food,

flowers, hospitality and questions – aimed at disarming the unchurched.

The final weekend away is a vital part of the course – and this has attracted the
most criticism, as it gives a chance for the leaders, if they are so disposed, to
present the Holy Spirit in an experimental fashion to a captive audience. The course
always ends with a Supper laid on to which more non-believers are invited, and so
the process continues.

Whatever else can be said about the Alpha Course, it has been a runaway success.
In 1991 there were just four courses involving 600 people; in 1993 there were
fewer than 10 courses being held in Britain. Now there are an estimated 3,000
being run regularly three times a year, more than 500 of them overseas. These are
being run by every denomination, including Catholic.

One difficulty in pinning down the problems with the Alpha Course is that each
church running the course will use the materials in a different way. Thus it is
feasible, in theory at least, that a church might avoid all controversy and simply use
the course to preach the gospel to unbelievers. This does leave unanswered the
question – why does any church need to buy a course to be able to preach the

However, there are deep concerns. Below I present some thoughts on the Alpha
Course by a Christian (i) who grew alarmed when viewing the course materials. It
is a personal view but I believe it speaks for many.

Alpha certainly starts by preaching the gospel; the first three talks on Video One
focus on the person and work of Jesus Christ, and the three talks on video Two
which cover fundamental steps for new Christians, such as ‘How can I be sure of
my faith?’, ‘Why and how should I read the Bible?’ and ‘Why and how should I
pray?’ are all good. But as the course progresses, some of the talks tend to wander
off into lengthy accounts of HTB’s experiences of the Toronto Blessing and
associated ministries, novel exegeses of various Biblical passages common amongst
pro-Toronto preachers, calls for unity despite truth and an over-emphasis on the
Holy Spirit, all of which are less than helpful, to say the least, to potential

Clearly the aim is to bring as many into God’s Kingdom as possible but by the end
of the course I cannot help feeling that the Toronto Blessing may have been the
greater beneficiary.

The Alpha course was virtually unknown until Eleanor Mumford of the South-West
London Vineyard church brought the Toronto Blessing from the Toronto Airport
Vineyard church in Canada to HTB, via Nicky Gumbel in May 1994, (ii) and
Nicky Gumbel spends a substantial amount of time relating to Alpha participants in
video 3 talk 9, exactly how it occurred:

“Ellie Mumford told us a little bit of what she had seen in Toronto… .it was
obvious that Ellie was just dying to pray for all of us.. then she said ‘Now
we’ll invite the Holy Spirit to come.’ and the moment she said that one of the
people there was thrown, literally, across the room and was lying on the
floor, just howling and laughing….making the most incredible noise….I
experienced the power of the Spirit in a way I hadn’t experienced for years,
like massive electricity going through my body… One of the guys was
prophesying. He was just lying there prophesying. . .”

Gumbel’s description of the antics that went on in the vestry of HTB after their
invocation of the Spirit seems to me to bear no resemblance at all to what
happened on the day of Pentecost. (iii)

Yet Alpha participants are being taught all this as part of an evangelistic/Christian
Living course as though it is normal and desirable, with absolutely no mention made
of the need to test the spirits (1 John 4:3), and at the end of this talk are prayed for,
corporately, to receive it. Thus, they are initiated into the Toronto Blessing without
a whimper of protest amongst them.

“I believe it is no coincidence that the present movement of the Holy Spirit
[TB] has come at the same time as the explosion of the Alpha Courses. I
think the two go together.” [Nicky Gumbel, ‘The Spirit and Evangelism’,
Renewal, May 1995, p15].

So one of my concerns is whether the TB, which is being experienced at HTB, can
possibly be divorced from the Alpha Initiative. In view of the similarities of
emphasis and content between the two, I’m not sure that it can. Alpha also
promotes, as does the leadership of the TB, ‘unity’ between Protestants and Roman
Catholics, with no consideration, or perhaps realisation, of the unreconcileable
doctrines of the two Churches, and so another concern is its trend towards


              Heavily influenced by the ‘Signs and Wonders’ ministry of John Wimber in the
1980s, power evangelism has been one of the preparation grounds for the Toronto
Experience. It focuses on a pragmatic/experiential rather than a
proclamatory/doctrinal approach to spreading the gospel. As such it tends to shift
the focus away from the shed blood of Jesus on the cross and onto the supernatural
works of the Holy Spirit carried out by men. This is the method of evangelism
favoured by Alpha. [Telling Others pp21-24;29-31].

              ALPHA AND THE NEW AGE

              All of this heightened interest amongst Charismatic Christians in ‘Signs and
Wonders’ and the supernatural experiences of the Toronto Blessing is a reflection
of spiritual and cultural changes going on outside Christianity, in which New Age
experiential mysticism predominates.

Nicky Gumbel is aware of this paradigm shift from reason to experience: “In the
Enlightenment reason ruled supreme and explanation led to experience. In the
present transitional culture, with its ‘pick-and-mix’ worldview in which the New
Age movement is a potent strand, experiences lead to explanation”. [Nicky
Gumbel, Telling Others, p19].

Post-Christian neo-mysticism is already so pervasive that virtually every
non-christian participant of Alpha – or any other evangelistic initiative – will reflect
to some degree New Age thinking. In New Age philosophy “experiences lead to
explanation” yet, like the Toronto Experience, the thrust of Alpha is towards the
experiential, not the written Word. One pastor who has made use of the Alpha
course writes: “One of the problems of proclaiming the gospel in a post-modern
world is that culture itself warms much more readily to lifestyle than to doctrine. But
the Christian lifestyle is not Christian faith… .I am sure that many people are being
converted through the Alpha course, but I have a suspicion that some of those
people are being converted to a Christian lifestyle rather than to Christ.”. [Ian
Lewis, ‘The Alpha Course’, Evangelicals Now, Dec 1995].

The two testimonies given by Alpha participants at the beginning of the first Alpha
video are prime examples of this. There are certain basic elements one would
expect to hear in a classic conversion testimony: the conviction of sin leading to
repentance and subsequent assurance of God’s forgiveness and salvation through
the death on the cross of Jesus Christ. But these are not there in any form in these
two testimonies.

A relationship with God is referred to, as is the experience of the baptism in the
Holy Spirit, prayer, an interest in Bible reading, church-going, Christianity and what
Alpha has done for them. But Jesus and what He has done for them and a
relationship with Him is not mentioned at all. Yet the Lord Jesus is the gospel, He is
salvation, He is their new life so how can He possibly be so completely overlooked
in a basic conversion testimony?

Adherents of false religions claim a relationship with God, and a prayer life, but
they are not saved. Many church goers read their Bibles and have an interest in
church and in Christianity, but they are not saved.

Likewise, more compassion/understanding at work, more patience, tolerance,
confidence and deep feelings of contentment can equally well be produced by a
sense of psychological well-being. Without the cross they do not constitute
salvation. The attempt by Nicky Gumbel to bring Jesus into the testimonies by
asking exactly what had made these differences, was met with a blank look and the
response: “Just the relationship that I’ve developed with God. Simple as that.”

These testimonies seemed to me to be, as Ian Lewis suggests, only evidence of
conversion to a Christian lifestyle, not to Christ. And when the “Christian lifestyle” is
an endless round of blessings’, supernatural ‘experiences’, spiritual ‘parties’ [see
video talk 14] and ‘play’-times (iv), then the transition from the counterfeit
spirituality of the New Age to Christianity is really only one of degree, not kind. In
which case I would echo the question of one evangelical minister who asked:
“What is it they are converted to?”


              “Scripture tells us that salvation comes through hearing the gospel, and I would
expect any course aimed at non-christians to concentrate primarily on the facts of
the gospel. The Alpha course deals with the basics of the gospel in two sessions…
While these are unequivocal gospel presentations, the remainder of the course
deals essentially with what may be described as Christian living… When we used an
adapted version of the course in our church, non-christians were left behind by
about the sixth week. They still had very fundamental questions about what
Christians believe, which were not answered by talking about how Christians live
and for this reason the course seemed more suited to people who have already
made a commitment to Christ.” [Ian Lewis, Evangelicals Now, Dec 1995].


              White Alpha training manual pp26-36/Video III talks 7-9 “We live in the age
of the Spirit.” [p29].

Christians have always referred to the period of time between the first and second
advents as the age of Grace, or the Church age. That has not changed. Why
encourage now, in such a precarious spiritual climate, the New Age concept of the
Age of Aquarius (the spirit)?

Continuing his observations on the New Age Nicky Gumbel writes: “I have found
on Alpha that those from an essentially enlightened background feel at home with
the parts of the course which appeal to the mind, but often have difficulty in
experiencing the Holy Spirit. Others coming from the New Age movement find that
rational and historical explanations leave them cold, but at the weekend away they
are on more familiar territory in experiencing the Holy Spirit.” [Telling Others, p19].

But it is the “rational and historical explanations” of sessions l and 2 which are the
essence of the gospel (Acts 2:22-41; 6:9-7:60; 8:26-38; 17:16-33) and which the
unbeliever must grasp and accept with his mind, under the convicting and
illuminating power of the Holy Spirit, if he is to repent and experience salvation in
his heart (Romans 10:13,14). Nevertheless: “At the end of the course I send out
questionnaires… if there is a change I ask when that change occurred. For many the
decisive moment is the Saturday evening of the weekend.” [Telling Others, p120].
This is the time when Nicky Gumbel invites the Holy Spirit to come and
participants are filled with the Spirit. [Telling Others, pp117,120,123; Blue Alpha
training manual p18]

I find this extremely worrying. The “decisive moment” should surely be the point at
which a person steps over from eternal death to eternal life through the conversion
experience (John 3:16; 5:24; Romans 10:9,10,13 and other refs). But most of the
testimonies in ‘Telling Others’ seem to confuse the experience of conversion with
the experience of baptism in the Holy Spirit.

But is this surprising when Nicky Gumbel himself seems to treat conversion as a
preliminary to the main event? The breath of new life into a repentant sinner is
taught in talk 7, but Nicky Gumbel does not make it clear that this happens at
conversion (2 Cor 5:17). Rather, he suggests this is due to a second experience:
the baptism in the Spirit.

The following testimony is an alarming example of the confusion between
conversion and baptism in the Holy Spirit, but it is by no means the only one:

“….my wife encouraged me to read an article in a magazine about the Alpha
course at HTB. What had stuck in my mind was how the work of the Holy
Spirit was described as of paramount importance. I knew in my heart I had
to have his power in my life at any cost. So I… enrolled on the course and
focused on the weekend where the work of the Holy Spirit is discussed…
.Never mind the weeks of pre-med, I just had to get into the operating
theatre… .I looked at the order of play, saw that the third session on ‘How
can I be filled with the Spirit (which I identified as the main one) was at
4:30pm and simply hung on like a marathon runner weaving his way up the
finishing straight with nothing but the finishing tape as the focus of his
attention… .the prize was so near but we were getting there so slowly. I
literally wanted to scream out ‘Do it now! Do it now! I can’t hold out any
longer’ I’m not exaggerating when I say I was in agony Then Nicky Gumbel
invited the Spirit to come and oh, the relief.” [Interview in Renewal, Oct
1995, p16; Telling Others pp36-37].

Though the prayer at the end of these talks includes repentance, the gospel talks
are not at this point uppermost in participants minds, and the corporate request
“inviting the Holy Spirit to come and fill us” is then made by all in the room.

             HOW CAN I RESIST EVIL?

              Session 9 White Alpha training manual pp39-45/Video IV Talk 10.

In section II of this session Satan’s tactics are listed: destroys; blinds eyes; causes
doubt; tempts; accuses. All of these Gumbel applies to the area of Christian
behaviour. Deception, the tactic focusing on belief, is omitted. This oversight can be
deadly. Deception concerning doctrine is Satan’s most powerful weapon against
the Church and new Christians need to be made aware just how practised Satan is
at deceiving Christians through false doctrines and false spiritual experiences. (v)

Gumbel points out in this talk that occult activity “always comes under the guise of
something good”. The Toronto Blessing is seen as “something good”. How strange
then that neither he nor anyone else at HTB thought to test the Toronto spirit before
accepting it and then passing it on to everyone else. (vi)

             HOW DOES GOD GUIDE US?

              Session 10 White Alpha training manual pp46-51/Video IV Talk 11

The “Guiding Spirit” and “more unusual ways” of guidance referred to in this talk,
especially guidance by angels, need thorough testing against Scripture in today’s
religious climate in which false prophets and occult ‘spirit guides’ masquerading as
angels of light abound.

A testimony in HTB in FOCUS: ALPHA NEWS, Aug 1995, in which Jesus is
referred to as “a guiding light” (p14), is just an inkling of what may be to come.

             DOES GOD HEAL TODAY?

              Session 12 White Alpha training manual ppS8-62/Video V Talk 13

During this talk Nicky Gumbel tells Alpha participants of the visit by John Wimber
to HTB in 1982 to demonstrate God’s power to heal. He says: “John Wimber then
said ‘We’ve had words of knowledge’ these are supernatural revelations, things that
they couldn’t have known otherwise about the conditions of people in the room…
specific details were given, accurately describing the conditions… .as the list was
responded to, the level of faith in the room was rising.”

Gumbel says that he still felt “cynical and hostile” until the following evening when

he  was prayed for: “So they prayed for the Spirit to come….I felt something like
10,000 volts going through my body….The American had a fairly limited prayer.
He just said ‘more power’….it was the only thing he ever prayed. I can’t remember
him ever praying anything else… Now we’ve seen many kinds of these
manifestations of the Spirit on the weekends… these manifestations… and the
physical healings themselves are not the important thing… .the fruit of the Spirit…
these are the things that matter, the fruit that comes from these experiences. So we
began to realise that God heals miraculously….”

Nicky Gumbel gives no indication here that he or anyone else attending that
meeting tested the spirits to ensure that everything came from the Holy Spirit.

And, of course, the fruit of the Holy Spirit does not come from “these experiences”
but from the daily sanctification by the Holy Spirit through obedience to the Word
(John 14:15;21;23-26;15:l-7;10;14-15).

Once again Alpha participants are not being warned of the very serious dangers of
accepting anything and everything from anyone and everyone. So they will walk out
of the cocoon of Alpha and straight into the path of the “enemy the devil [who]
prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour”. (1 Peter 5:8).



              Session 13 White Alpha training manual pp63-68/Video V Talk 14

             (1) ROMANISM

              “The Alpha course is… adaptable across tradition and denominations… .I
know of its uses in Catholic… churches.” [Martin Cavender in Telling

Adaptable in what sense exactly? Alpha’s publications manager advises that, while
presentation of the material can be adapted to suit, the content should be followed
exactly. (He makes particular reference to the weekend dealing with the Holy Spirit
in this respect) [Christian Herald, 9:12:1995].

If the content of the course teaches the fundamental historical and theological facts
and doctrines of the Christian faith as recorded in Scripture, then, having tested and
proved that to be so, any Protestant church using Alpha could follow the course
exactly. But could a Catholic church do that?

In talk 8 and in section II of this talk Gumbel teaches Alpha participants that the
differences between Protestants and Catholics are “totally insignificant compared to
the things that unite us… we need to unite around the death of Jesus, the
resurrection of Jesus; the absolute essential things at the core of the Christian faith
on which we are all agreed. We need to give people liberty to disagree on the
things which are secondary.”

I agree wholeheartedly with the last sentence but that is not the issue here. It is on
the essentials that Protestants and Catholics do not have unity. That was the whole
point of the Protestant Reformation. Discussing the price of unity in the Church,
Bishop Ryle wrote: “Our noble Reformers bought the truth at the price of their own
blood, and handed it down to us. Let us take heed that we do not basely sell it for
a mess of pottage, under the specious names of unity and peace.” [Warnings to the
Churches, 1877, p128].

Still Gumbel says: “We need to unite… there has been some comment which is not
helpful to unity. Let us drop that and get on. It is wonderful that the movement of
the Spirit will always bring churches together. He is doing that right across the
denominations and within the traditions… we are seeing Roman Catholics coming
now… Nobody is suspicious of anybody else… People are no longer ‘labelling’
themselves or others. I long for the day when we drop all these labels and just
regard ourselves as Christians with a commission from Jesus Christ.” [Renewal,
May 1995,p16]

‘Adaptability’ of the Alpha course to include Catholics, not necessarily to convert
them, is referred to in Alpha as ‘unity’ and I am concerned that Alpha is contributing
– albeit unintentionally – to the undoing of the Protestant Reformation through the
promulgation of ecumenism disguised as Christian Unity.



              “A disunited church, squabbling and criticising makes it very hard for the
world to believe”. [Gumbel, Renewal, May 1995, p16]. Consequently “we
make it a rule on Alpha never to criticise another denomination, another
Christian church or a Christian leader.” [Telling Others, p114; and this talk,
section II].

Yet there are times when failure to ‘criticise’ – or rather to rebuke and correct (2
Tim 3:16; 4:2-5) – is actually to be disobedient to the Word of God. Although in
talk five Gumbel only applied the rebuking and correcting to Christian behaviour, it
also applies to false teaching. We must certainly not judge one another’s sins or
their hearts (e.g. Matt 7:1-5), or their personalities, but we are to test all teachings
prophesies and practices against Scripture and judge whether they are true or false
(1 Cor 2:15;16; 1 John 4:1).

According to Ephesians 4:3-6 Christian unity comes through our being baptised
through one Spirit into “one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of

Unity is also essential to Latter-Rain doctrine, to enable the incarnation of Christ
into His physical body (the Church), because He cannot incarnate a divided body.
But Latter-Rain is a “different gospel” (Gal 1:6-7) with a faulty eschatology which is
insinuating itself into Charismatic fellowships these days; one of its most successful
routes being the Toronto Blessing (vii).

It is vital that we “earnestly contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to
the saints” (Jude 3). If not, we may find ourselves, and those new believers we
have nurtured, part of the Apostate church.


             (3) THE PARABLE OF THE PARTY

              In section IV, Gumbel says the Church, though God’s HolyTemple, so often loses
“the sense of the presence of God in its midst”. He is making reference here to the
Sunday meetings of believers rather than to the Church as the body of Christ and
uses the parable of the Prodigal Son to explain that Sunday services should be like
a ‘party’. “Jesus was saying that….the Church is like….a feast and a celebration, and
at a party everyone has a good time. There’s fun, there’s laughter… .Why shouldn’t
there be laughter at the biggest party of all? and that’s what we’re seeing today,
laughter and fun, and people getting drunk – not with wine, Paul says ‘don’t get
drunk with wine – be filled with the Spirit, Come to a party where you can get
drunk on God… .I was at a party like that last night. It was a whole load of church
leaders, and we invited the Spirit to come… It was a party thrown by the Holy
Spirit. It was a fun place to be. The Church is meant to be a party…”

The Church will celebrate the marriage feast of the Lamb when the Lord Jesus
returns, but I find no references to “fun” or “parties” anywhere in Scripture, except
in denunciation. In 1 Corinthians 10:1-11 for example. Until Jesus returns and we
attend the marriage feast of the Lamb, there is no place for “parties” or “festivals”;
not even “to the Lord”.


              It may only be part of Alpha’s teaching which does not accord with Scripture, but I
would say with Paul: “A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough.” (Gal

Every Christian and every fellowship is able to witness to the gospel. Many
fellowships create their own evangelistic courses under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit. It should not be necessary to rely on the methods and techniques of another
fellowship when we have all the instruction and teaching material we need in
Scripture, all the experience we need in each of our relationships with the Lord
Jesus and are each empowered by the Holy Spirit to go and do it. But if leaders do
decide to use the Alpha course they should at least consider the following points in
light of the concerns above:

That they ensure non-believing participants have fully understood the meaning of
the cross and are saved (sessions I and 2) before propelling them into a course on
Christian Living. (sessions 3-14).

That they ensure converts are fully aware of their conversion experience and are
becoming stable in their daily relationship with the Lord Jesus before thrusting them
into the baptism of the Holy Spirit, for which they are not yet ready and which
could allow into their lives the influence of an alien spirit through ground given,
albeit unintentionally.

That they ensure participants understand the different nature of the work of each
person in the Trinity.

That they ensure the fruit of the Holy Spirit, and his convicting and sanctifying
work in a believer’s life is not submerged beneath the gifts and the power of the
Holy Spirit.

That they ensure participants are taught to proceed from the Word to experience,
not from experience to the Word.

Following from this, that they ensure participants understand that deception
regarding doctrine and supernatural phenomena has always been Satan’s main
weapon against the Church and that knowing and standing fast in the Word is our
weapon of defence, as it was for Jesus (Matt 4:1-11).

That they ensure participants are taught to become Bereans (Acts 17:11) able to
test everything against Scripture for themselves, not relying on leaders, who are not
infallible (e.g. Gal 2:11-14), to do their thinking and living for them.

That they revise the booklist on pp72-75 of the white Alpha training manual as it
tends to display a bias towards writers sympathetic to the Vineyard/Toronto
Experience/Restorationist persuasion, while omitting other sound and more obvious
choices in several of the sessions.

In 1877 Bishop Ryle wrote: “The Lord Jesus Christ declares, ‘I will build My
Church’….Ministers may preach, and writers may write, but the Lord Jesus Christ
alone can build. And except He builds, the work stands still….Sometimes the work
goes on fast, and sometimes it goes on slowly. Man is frequently impatient, and
thinks that nothing is doing. But man’s time is not God’s time. A thousand years in
His sight are but as a single day. The great builder makes no mistakes. He knows
what He is doing. He sees the end from the beginning. He works by a perfect,
unalterable and certain plan.” [J.C. Ryle ‘The True Church’ in Warnings to the
Churches, 1877, pp13-14].

[Note: Nicky Gumbel dates his call to evangelism (Tape Five of the video set) to
the 1982 incident in which he received prayer from John Wimber. On that
occasion, he experienced such supernatural power that he had to call out for it to
stop. Wimber gave a “word” that Gumbel had been given “a gift of telling people
about Jesus”.]

  A much expanded version of this paper is presently available from Jo Gardner,
             price £1.25 incl. postage. Write to: Adullam Register/Alpha, 86 Manor Way,
             Croxley Green, Herts WD3 3LY. This paper and other material will also shortly be
             produced in the form of a booklet. Enquiries to Jo Gardner, not Banner!


(i) Letters to the author should be directed to Banner Ministries.

(ii) HTB in Focus: Alpha News, Aug 1995 p9. See also Wallace Boulton, ed., The
Impact Of Toronto, 1995 pp2O-24.

(iii) See Richard Smith, “Spiritual Drunkenness”, Sept 1994.

(iv) See Wallace Boulton, ed., The Impact Of Toronto, 1995, p19.

Also David Noakes, Dealing With Poison In The Pot, audio tape, CFCM 95/04,
side 1.

And Johannes Facius, ‘Laugh? I Nearly Cried’ in Prophecy Today, May/June
1995, p25.

(v) See for example, Robert M. Bowman, Orthodoxy And Heresy: A Biblical
Guide To Doctrinal Discernment, 1993. And J.C. Ryle, Warnings To The
Churches, 1877.

(vi) During the Leadership Consultation held in January and March 1995, by the
Centre for Contemporary Ministry, it was noted that Wm Branham also practised
impartation of the Spirit, which others could then pass on. Arnott has likened the
Toronto Blessing to a virus. (See Haggai 2:10-14).

(vii) See ‘Birth of the Manchild’ in Mainstream, Spring 1995, ppi-5 for the
eschatology being taught at some Vineyard churches

1 Comment

Filed under The Ramblings of a Reformed Ecclesiastic

Nicky Gumbel

wow! Nicky Gumbel and Johnny Vegas together on One sofa. Despite certain personal reservations about the Alpha course, I’m impressed by Nicky’s sincerity and self-effacing charm. Not “rules and regulations” but a “relationship with God” Right on, Rev!

Leave a comment

Filed under The Ramblings of a Reformed Ecclesiastic